| Contingent Business Interruption Insurance |
|
| Business interruption insurance is a form of property insurance that reimburses a business for losses that arise due to damage to the property of the business that reduces the ability of the business to continue its operations. Contingent business interruption insurance is also available to provide coverage for business continuation losses occurring to a business when property of another business is damaged or destroyed. More... |
|
|
| Conditions Precedent to Uninsured Motorist Coverage |
|
| Uninsured motorist (UM) benefits are available to an insured so that he may recover from his insurer in the event he is involved in a motor vehicle accident with an uninsured driver. In order for the insured to obtain recovery under UM coverage, several conditions must first be met. More... |
|
|
| Drop Down of Excess Coverage If the Primary Insurer Becomes Insolvent |
|
| Although insolvency of an insurer may be considered a relatively rare event, the effect of such insolvencies on policyholders can be substantial. Most jurisdictions have insurance guaranty associations that will provide some coverage in place of an insolvent insurer, but such coverage usually is limited as to the amount and type of reimbursement of losses that will be available. Affected policyholders should consider whether an excess insurer has an obligation to "drop down" and take the place of an insolvent primary insurer. More... |
|
|
| Airport Owners and Operators Liability Insurance |
|
| Aviation insurance includes markets for general aviation, commercial aviation, manufacturers of aircraft and aircraft components, and owners and operators of airports. Airport owner and operator liability insurance policies generally cover damages from injuries at airports or due to airport operations. More... |
|
|
| Insurance Law |
|
| If an insured suffers a loss for which an insurer denies coverage, the insured may attempt to recover damages from the agent or the insurer on the ground that he would not have purchased such a policy had the agent explained it to him. The action may be brought under a negligence theory. In such a case, the insured would need to prove that the agent had a duty of care to explain the policy to him. More... |
|
|